|
I. Introduction
In the aftermath of President Soeharto's resignation in May 1998, political
tension in Irian Jaya, Indonesia's easternmost province, has increased. The
province, called West Papua by supporters of independence, occupies the
western half of the island of New Guinea. Unlike the rest of Indonesia which
gained independence in 1949, Irian Jaya was under Dutch control until 1963
and only became part of Indonesia after a fraudulent, U.N.-supervised "Act
of Free Choice" in 1969.(1) Over the last three decades, support for
independence, fueled by resentment of Indonesian rule, loss of ancestral
land to development projects, and the influx of migrants from elsewhere in
the country, has taken the form of both an armed guerrilla movement, the
Free Papua Movement (Organisasi Papua Merdeka or OPM), and generally
non-violent attempts to raise the West Papuan flag. Guerrilla activity has
led in most cases to military operations in which civilians have suffered a
wide range of abuses; flag-raisings and other demonstrations have led to the
arrests of those involved, often on charges of subversion or rebellion.
When it took office, the government of B.J. Habibie made initial efforts to
recognize and apologize for the human rights violations that its predecessor
had committed in Irian Jaya. But the willingness to acknowledge past abuses
in general terms was not accompanied by any concrete measures toward justice
or redress for the victims. Indeed, it took until October 1998 for the
military to declare an end to the designation of Irian Jaya as a combat area
(daerah operasi militer or DOM). In the meantime, the independence movement
grew stronger, in part because of the climate of greater political openness,
in part because of a belief that international support would now be stronger.
Students in Irian Jaya also organized themselves following the model of
student activists in Jakarta and other cities but directed their demands
toward independence rather than Habibie's removal.
As a consequence, in early July 1998 and again in October, a series of
pro-independence emonstrations took place across Irian Jaya. The
independence demonstrations, not all wholly peaceful, led to the shooting of
demonstrators by security forces in the provincial capital, Jayapura, and in
the district of Biak; to arrests in Sorong and Jayawijaya; and to rioting by
angry mobs in Manokwari. One student and one police intelligence agent died
in Jayapura. The death toll remains unclear in Biak; one person is known to
have died in the local hospital and two others died shortly after their
release from prison. There were reports of trucks taking away the wounded,
however, and over thirty bodies washed up on the shore of East Biak in the
weeks after the shootings took place. The government claimed they were
victims of a tsunami that struck neighboring Papua New Guinea; local people
are convinced they were victims of the shooting. The bodies were buried
without autopsy near the sites where they were found, contributing to the
suspicion of a government cover-up. The trial of suspects in the Biak
demonstrations began on October 5; the prosecution was expected to rest its
case by mid-December.
In Manokwari, efforts by independence supporters to raise the West Papuan
flag on October 2 were stopped by police and led to a rampage through the
business district and outlying areas, destroying many homes and shops.
Nineteen people were arrested, all of whom were later released pending
trial. In Jayapura, a man named Sem Yaru tried to organize a demonstration
on the same day, but it failed after church leaders urged their followers
not to take part, worried that Yaru was acting as a provocateur. Yaru and
four others were arrested for planning the abortive demonstration and for
helping organize the July demonstrations. The arrest of a sixth man in early
October, Theys Eluay, caused such public outrage that all six were
eventually released to house arrest pending trial on October 22. Their
trials were expected to begin in January 1999. But the Biak and Jayapura
demonstrations and deaths shocked Jakarta into action. In July, the national
parliament sent a fact-finding team to Irian Jaya to discuss local
grievances under the chairmanship of Abdul Gafur, the deputy speaker;
members spent much of August in the province and concluded that the
independence demands stemmed from human rights violations, unhappiness with
the government-sponsored transmigration projects, concerns about
Islamicization of a traditionally Christian area, and underrepresentation of
indigenous people in the local government -- and from the "latent influence
of the OPM."(2)
In late July, a new organization called Forum for the Reconciliation of the
People of Irian Jaya (FORERI), composed of church leaders, intellectuals,
and nongovernmental activists, first broached the idea with the
parliamentary fact-finding team of addressing the aspirations of the Papuan
people through a "national dialogue." The aim would be to discuss possible
political solutions for Irian Jaya, ranging from autonomy to federalism to
independence. On August 1, at a seminar in Jayapura, leading public figures
from Irian Jaya took up the idea and suggested that the dialogue could be
followed by an international dialogue involving the United Nations. The
Habibie government cautiously welcomed the idea, and concrete discussions on
how to conduct a national dialogue began in earnest in October. In
mid-November, the dialogue was scheduled to begin in early 1999, but there
was no agreement between the government, which wanted to restrict the
discussion to autonomy (known as the "O word," otonomi, in its Indonesian
spelling), and many community leaders, who believed the dialogue could only
be meaningful if independence (the "M word," merdeka) was also discussed. By
late November, as more and more avowedly pro-independence organizations
began to make themselves heard, the government was suggesting that the
dialogue be pushed back until after the 1999 general elections, that is, to
late 1999 or early 2000. The stated rationale was that it would be better
for the dialogue to be held with a more representative government. The
not-so-hidden concern may have been that the issue of independence was all
too clearly going to dominate the agenda.
Recommendations
Human Rights Watch calls on the Indonesian
government:
- to fully investigate the shooting by the military in Biak. It would
be important for the investigation to include an assessment of the
extent to which the army's actions did or did not conform to accepted
principles of international law, in particular the U.N. Basic Principles
on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.
- to allow full and impartial investigations into reports that at
least ten people believed to have been present at the demonstrations
never returned home and are feared dead.
- to conduct, in the presence of NGOs and forensic pathologists, an
exhumation of at least some of the graves of the alleged tsunami victims
so that the cause of death can be conclusively determined.
- to ensure that full freedom of expression be permitted in Irian
Jaya, including free debate over the full range of options for Irian
Jaya's future political status. Human Rights Watch takes no position on
what that status should be but believes that the right to peacefully
express opinions in support of Independence is fully supported by
international human rights standards.
II. Background to the Demonstration
Initially, the July demonstrations across the province were reported to have
been sparked by a letter from several members of the U.S. Congress to
President Habibie, calling, among other things, for a dialogue on the
political status of Irian Jaya and East Timor. Representative Christopher
Smith presented the letter to Habibie during a visit to Jakarta in late May;
copies of the letter and translations of the text were widely circulated in
Irian Jaya and construed as American support for the independence of Irian
Jaya. One observer in Biak at the time noted that photocopy shops were full
of people reproducing the letter, together with other documents relating to
the history of the territory's incorporation into Indonesia. (3)
The timing of the letter was important, because in the euphoria following
Soeharto's resignation, anything seemed possible -- demonstrations that had
never been allowed before, discussions on topics that were previously taboo,
even fundamental changes in the political landscape and a restructuring of
the highly centralized political system of Soeharto's "New Order" were
thinkable for the first time in recent memory. The accumulated resentment of
three decades of harsh and often discriminatory Indonesian rule in Irian
Jaya and the shared knowledge of how international politics cheated them out
of having their own country in the 1960s combined to give many in Irian Jaya
a sense that it was time to revisit the question of independence. While the
pro-independence guerrilla movement OPM has been operating in Irian Jaya
since the 1960s, it is important to underscore that the desire for self-rule
and an end to the Indonesian presence is widely held among people who have
no connection of any kind to the guerrillas.
The U.S. parliamentarians' letter was almost certainly a factor in the
demonstrations, and it was mentioned by the leaders of the actions in
Jayapura, Sorong, and Biak, but there were many other possible causes. Human
Rights Watch has obtained a copy of a memo dated June 25, 1998 and marked "secret."
The memo, sent by the intelligence section of the provincial police command
to all police stations across Irian Jaya, warns of a rash of OPM-led
pro-independence actions, "in the lead-up to the [anniversary of the]
independence of West Melanesia [sic] on July 1, 1998." The memo was based on
a letter that appeared in the Irian Jaya governor's office on June 2, sent
by the Supreme Military Command of the Front for the Liberation of West
Papua, a name for the top leadership of the OPM.
According to the memo, the letter included the text of the proclamation of
independence of West Papua on July 1, 1961(4) and listed the symbols of
statehood, among them, the "morning star" flag that was designed in 1961 as
preparations for independence got underway. It demanded independence for
West Papua before the year 2000. It recalled the August 15, 1962 "Rome
Agreement" between the Netherlands and Indonesia where it was agreed that
the principle of "one man, one vote" would be applied in the act of free
choice, and noted how this agreement was violated. The letter said that on
July 1, 1998, in nine districts of Irian Jaya, the people would take action
to demand independence and secession from Indonesia. For Jayapura, the
letter said, people would gather in Sentani and march to the provincial
parliament building. At each of these demonstrations, the morning star flag
would be raised.
The police memo then warned that these plans could be used by elements
inside and outside Indonesia to further destabilize the situation,
particularly in Irian Jaya, and create negative feelings toward the
government. It called on all recipients of the memo to step up surveillance
and monitoring prior to July 1.
If true, the OPM letter referred to in the memo could help explain the early
July timing of the flag-raising actions and why these actions took place in
so many different places. But whatever the OPM may have planned, the fact
that its letter was addressed to Soeharto more than a month after his
resignation does not say much about its access to information or ability to
coordinate a widely dispersed set of actions. In only one of the July
actions is there clear evidence of OPM involvement, and that one received no
publicity whatsoever -- the raising of a flag on July 6 in Mugi, Jayawijaya
district, by acknowledged OPM leader Daniel Kagoya.
Local activists believe the letter from the OPM leadership never existed and
was manufactured by the military to make it seem as though Irian Jaya was
still in need of heightened security measures; an OPM threat would justify a
large troop presence at a time when the public was demanding troop
withdrawals. They point to the military's involvement in a number of
lucrative economic enterprises in the province, especially timber and mining,
and note that a greatly reduced military presence could have negative
economic implications for some of the commanders involved.(5)
An observer in Biak shortly after the demonstrations wrote us in relation to
the above argument, "Whatever one makes of the conspiracy theory, it does
seem clear that the interests of Agus Edyono, the Biak military commander,
were advanced by the recent unrest. The current district head is due to step
down in six months. The flag-raising is being used as an excuse for
appointing a non-Biak from the armed forces -- the last three have been from
the island -- and Agus Edyono is one of the leading candidates. The post has
been a 'wet one' in recent years, with all the money flowing in for
road-building, tourism development, and earthquake relief." (6)
Another factor in the demonstrations was the increased mobilization of local
people around calls for the withdrawal of the Indonesian troops,
particularly after a report released by church leaders in May citing human
rights abuses during counterinsurgency operations in the central highlands
of Irian Jaya. They also note that one impact of Soeharto's resignation on
May 21 was a belief that the new post-Soeharto era of political reform
should allow more freedom to voice aspirations for independence. In any
case, the resentment against Indonesia is deep enough and the post-Soeharto
political atmosphere open enough for a variety of pro-independence
expressions to take place without any links to the guerrillas.
III. Sorong and Jayapura
On July 2, thousands of young people calling themselves Reform Forum of
Students and the People of Sorong (Forum Reformasi Mahasiswa dan Masyarakat
Sorong Irian Jaya) took part in a pro-indepen-dence demonstration in front
of the district council of Sorong. They presented nine demands to the
council in a document called "Political Position Statement." The demands
included support for the proclamation of the independence of West Papua in
July 1971; the granting of independence to West Papua as quickly as possible
by President Habibie; immediate release of West Papuan political prisoners
detained in Kalisosok Prison, Surabaya, Pamekasan Prison, Madura, and
Cipinang Prison, Jakarta; withdrawal of Indonesian troops and all Indonesian
people from West Papua; observance of the Rome promises made by former
President Soeharto; attention to the letter from U.S. members of Congress
dated May 22, 1998 and the appeal dated May 26, 1998 from the U.S. Senate to
the government of Indonesia regarding self-determination for the people of
West Papua; review of the U.N.-supervised "Act of Free Choice" undertaken in
1969 in West Irian; cancelling of all political statements from Irian Jaya
that indicate that West Papua is under Indonesian administration; and the
immediate dispatch of a team from the National Human Rights Commission to
meet with the demonstrators in Sorong. When their appeals went unheeded,
they began using violence, burning the district council building and several
stores as well as the car belonging to the district head. As troops arrived,
five people were reportedly shot; the crowd then attacked the district
military commander, Lt. Col. Nico Obaja Woru, who had to be hospitalized.
The demonstration that led to the shootings of two students on July 3 began
as students from Cenderawasih University held an "open forum" (mimbar bebas)
on the campus in Abepura, a suburb of Jayapura. Trouble broke out after
students spotted an intelligence agent from the local police sitting under a
tree. According to reports, a group of students grabbed his identity card,
confirmed that he was from intelligence, and began beating him up. They also
took his pistol. The agent, Sergeant Dahlan, was initially listed in
critical condition in a Jayapura hospital, and one newspaper reported he had
died on Saturday. As word of the beating reached security forces, trucks
full of anti-riot and regular army troops came into Abepura. Demonstrators
were massed outside the campus on the main road and began throwing stones at
the trucks. It was at this point that troops fired warning shots, according
to the regional military commander. Soldiers then apparently opened fire
into the crowd. A law student, Steven Suripatti, and a high school student,
Corina Ruth Onim, were seriously wounded. Suripatti appeared to have been
hit in the head by a regular bullet, although the military maintained they
were using only blanks and rubber bullets; he later died in a Jayapura
hospital. Ms. Onim, who was shot in the knees, was expected to recover. She
was on the campus of the Iskijne Technical High School near the university
at the time.
On July 5, Major General Sembiring, the regional military commander,
apologized for the shootings and promised to investigate them; he said he
did not know who fired the actual shots.
IV. The Biak Demonstration
From July 2 to July 6, when the military opened fire, the morning star flag
flew over the thirty-five-meter-tall water tower near the harbor in Biak
town. (Biak is the name of the island, the district, and the district
capital.) The demonstration was led by a Jayapura-based provincial
government employee named Filip (Philip) "Yopy" Karma. Like others, he had
copies of the May 22 letter of the U.S. members of Congress, interpreted it
as support for independence, and drafted a declaration of independence
accordingly.
The flag appeared on the top of the tower on July 2, at about 5:00 a.m. Some
seventy-five people gathered beneath it, shouting freedom slogans, singing
songs and dancing traditional dances. Some had painted their faces and arms
with the morning star symbol, and as the demonstration continued, many
people in the immediate area joined in. The water tower is near both the
main taxi terminal and a major market, so the site is one that many people
would pass as part of their daily lives. Small boys reportedly guarded the
area wearing armbands that said "Satgas [task force] OPM." The demonstration
grew to more than 500 people by one account. (7)
Around 9:00 a.m., the district head of Biak, Amandus Mansnembra, together
with the district military and police commanders, came, in the words of the
military commander, "to give guidance and direction" to the demonstrators,
but they "did not want to listen."(8) Instead, they held an open forum as
part of their protest. Yopy Karma appeared as one of the speakers to voice
the aspirations of the people of Biak and demand independence for the people
of West Papua. Among other things, he read out the following oath:
1. We, the people of West Papua, pledge to stay united, no matter what the
circumstances, under the flag of West Papua and the eastern morning star and
pledge to live and die for the flag of West Papua which has already flown
over an independent Papuan land.
2. We, the people of West Papua, pledge to continue our struggle to demand
our right to independence and the freedom of all West Papuan prisoners and
detainees held by the government of Indonesia.
3. We, the people of West Papua, pledge to struggle to uphold the ideal of
the independence of West Papua.
4. We, the people of West Papua, demand the implementation of the fourth
point of the letter from the American Congress dated May 22, 1998, that is,
that the people of Irian Jaya be given full human rights and a solution of
their political status (independence).
5. We, the people of West Papua, declare that the Republic of Indonesia
cannot interfere in the affairs of West Papua.
6. We, the people of West Papua, ask that our security be guaranteed by the
United Nations and by no one else.
7. We, the people of West Papua, ask that the United Nations give full
independence to the state of West Papua in accordance with the urging of the
American Congress in its letter of May 22, 1998.
8. We, the people of West Papua, will not consider entering into a dialogue
with anyone or any party except for the United Nations, and we ask that
Secretary General Kofi Annan come here.
9. We, the people of West Papua, will always be loyal to and will support
the flag of West Papua.
10. We, the people of West Papua, hereby state that no one can take away our
independence.
God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, is witness to this pledge.
Biak, Thursday, July 2, 1998 19:30 (9)
About 4:30 p.m., security forces tried to break up the demonstration. When
the crowd recognized one intelligence agent there, Police Sergeant Irwan,
who they believed had been infiltrated into the crowd to cause trouble, they
attacked him, knocking out a few teeth and breaking his leg. This led to a
violent clash between the demonstrators and the security forces surrounding
them. The latter consisted of a Brimob platoon, a platoon from Infantry
Battalion 753, one from KODIM 1702, and one from the Biak navy post.
According to a report prepared by local activists, thirteen troops were
wounded, nine of them lightly, while two others with serious injuries were
airlifted out of Irian Jaya. Eleven of the thirteen wounded were from the
Biak police. A military report said twenty-three of the security forces were
wounded, seventeen lightly, three seriously, and three critically. The
troops were eventually withdrawn around 8:00 p.m.
Economic activity in the area came to a halt because of the demonstrations.
Shops and kiosks in the area closed down, and trading in the old market
ceased around 5:00 p.m. After about 5:30, the main road in the town of Biak
was virtually empty. According to the military report on the incident, the
demonstrators had set up blockades around the area, preventing anyone from
reaching the harbor. A ship that was supposed to dock at 5:00 p.m., the
Dobonsolo, was unable to do so and had to anchor offshore.
Meanwhile, on the same day, on July 2, in the subdistrict of West Biak,
eleven village heads were ordered by the subdistrict authorities to call a
counterdemonstration at the Numfor district council against the separatist
activities of Yopy Karma. The villages represented were Mandenderi, Adadikam,
Mamoribo, Sopen, Opuri, Dedifu, Yomdori, Kababur, Warberik, Wasyai, and
Andey. The village heads were all told that to ensure that the people of
West Biak were not branded as OPM, they had to take part in this action.
Early on July 3, those gathered beneath the water tower began to hear rumors
that there was going to be a move to break up the demonstration. The
subdistrict authorities, through their meeting with village heads,
reportedly secured an agreement that there would be two prongs to the attack.
A crowd from West Biak would gather in a housing complex north of the
airport and would go by truck to the demonstration site. When they got near
the gas pumps in the harbor, they would be let off to attack the
demonstrators. Another group would gather in front of the guardpost of the
air force in front of the Hotel Sinar Kayu, then would attack from the south.
About 5:30 a.m. on July 3, the village heads were taken home to gather up
residents to be trucked into Biak, and about 1:00 p.m., seven trucks
belonging to the Karya Kencana Harpindo company brought counterdemonstrators
into the city. They were given a kind of armband so that if a clash took
place with the flag-raisers, the army would know whom to protect. But no
attack took place; the counterdemonstrators reportedly chose to act
peacefully.
According to the local activists' report, the villagers were given
pro-government banners to hold, and some expressed reluctance to take part
in the counterdemonstration. According to the military report, 250 people
from thirteen villages sought out local military and civilian leaders of
their own accord to tell them that they rejected the idea of an independent
West Papua, that they did not want a repetition of the bitter experience of
years past, and that they wanted nothing more than to work hard and help
development the district of Biak.(10) Human rights organizations in Jayapura
dismissed the military's account as self-serving.
The pro-independence demonstrators, in the meantime, hearing that they were
going to be attacked, had prepared themselves with bamboo spears and molotov
cocktails, and cut down trees to block the way into the demonstration area,
according to the report from local activists. The head of the district
council for Biak, Ayub Sumerta, came and asked Yopy Karma to take down the
flag, but before doing so, he reportedly took off his hat to honor it. He
then invited the people to come to the district council to discuss their
demands, but they wanted to stay to guard the flag.
At 1:00 a.m. on July 4, the local military brought nine village heads
together to discuss a strategy for attack, and both the subdistrict head (camat)
and the subdistrict military commander told the village heads that each man
was responsible for bringing thirty men into the city. He also told them
that the district commander's instructions were that each man should bring a
weapon of some sort, whether a spear, a knife, or some other sharp object.
At 8:00 a.m., negotiations began between the army and church leaders to try
to resolve the situation. As a result, troops were pulled back from around
the district health clinic, near the water tower, but the demonstrators
refused to leave, saying they would stay until a representative of Kofi
Annan came or a representative of the U.S. embassy in Jakarta.
At 2:00 p.m., a Hercules transport plane landed in Biak with troops from the
Trikora regional command, the regional command based in Ujung Pandang,
Sulawesi, and anti-riot forces from the police mobile brigade. Shortly
thereafter, a group of pastors from the Irian Jaya Tabernacle Church (GKII)
began further negotiations with the demonstrators, who turned over the
molotov cocktails, spears, and other weapons they had amassed for
self-defense. They pledged on the Bible, however, to defend the morning star
flag to the death.
On July 5, after Sunday services, villagers from West Biak were brought to
Yomdori, the subdistrict center, where they stayed overnight before
proceeding on to the city to prepare for the attack. The pastors, meanwhile,
tried unsuccessfully to convince Yopy Karma to take down the flag.
The long-awaited attack took place at 5:00 a.m. on July 6. Troops from
Battalion 733 Pattimura, stationed at the air force base at Manuhua aided
local forces, and were reinforced by troops from two warships, a logistics
ship called Waigeo and another with a registration number of 108. The troops
opened fire from four sides. Witnesses reported that five civilians who were
already on the ground prone were deliberately shot. By 9:00 a.m., twenty-one
people had been brought to the hospital, one of whom, Ruben Orboi, died
about an hour later in the hospital's emergency room; he had been shot in
the head. (A month later, his body had still not been turned over to his
family.) Soldiers were all over the hospital, and a nurse on duty said her
superior was ordered not to say anything about anyone having died. She also
told Human Rights Watch that when an army truck drew up to the hospital
entrance with some of the wounded, the latter were just pushed off the
truck.(11) She said Yopy Karma's brother, Costan, was told to jump off the
truck even though his feet and hands were tied. He of course fell to the
ground. Although he was barely conscious, soldiers forbade the nurses to
untie him, but they did anyway, after pleading with him not to run. (12)
One young man who was in the crowd when the shooting started told Human
Rights Watch that the army loaded people on trucks, dead, wounded, and
unhurt, and headed for the outskirts of the town. When they reached the
jungle, he and ten others were let off the truck, while the remaining
wounded and dead were driven on, to where he had no idea. He was then picked
up with the other survivors and taken to the navy headquarters, where he was
held from July 6 to July 11 and repeatedly kicked and beaten. He was not
allowed to contact his family, who assumed he had died, and it was not until
he returned home on July 11 that they knew he was alive. (13)
Additional violence followed the shooting, when youths from Sorido, armed
with molotov cocktails, set fire to shops owned by immigrants from South
Sulawesi in the area of Kampung Baru, about a mile from Kampung Baru. The
youths were apparently intending to join the demonstration, but when they
saw trucks taking wounded demonstrators to the hospital, they turned on the
shops instead.
People living near the water tower were taken to the port area on the day of
the attack and were forced to remain there all day. Anyone who complained
was beaten, according to one written eyewitness account made available to
Human Rights Watch. Of 150 people arrested after the crackdown, nineteen
eventually were charged and tried and as of November 30, 1998, were detained
at the Biak district prison. Their trials began on October 5 and were
continuing at the time this report went to press. All were charged with
rebellion, spreading hatred toward the government, and assault, under
Articles 106, 154, and 170 respectively of the Indonesian criminal code.
(See Appendix I for list.)
In addition, two young men, Paulus Mamoribo and Nico Smas, died shortly
after being released from detention, about three weeks after the shootings.
The causes of death are not clear, but in neither case was an autopsy
conducted. Mamoribo, who had been shot in the hand during the demonstration,
died at his home; Nico Smas collapsed and died while walking in the street.
At least ten others believed to have taken part in the demonstration never
returned home, but a full accounting of the missing has not been possible
because of the climate of fear that prevails in Biak as of this writing.
V. Bodies in Biak
In the meantime, thirty-three bodies of men, women, and children washed up
on the shore of East and North Biak beginning on July 27. The Indonesian
army claimed they were victims of the tsunami that struck Aitepe, Papua New
Guinea on July 16. There were unconfirmed reports from local people that
some of the bodies had their hands tied behind their backs, and one was
wearing a Golkar T-shirt, giving rise to the belief that at least some of
the bodies might be those of shooting victims. Activists have questioned why
bodies from the tsunami only showed up in Biak and nowhere else, whereas
there are many other places along the Irian Jaya coast closer to Papua New
Guinea than Biak. On the other hand, reports in the local newspaper, the
Cenderawasih Pos, quoting military sources, stated that some of the bodies
were tattooed with marks only found among Papuan New Guinea natives, and
other artifacts including schoolbooks and a map that washed up with the
bodies suggest strongly that they are tsunami victims. A medic who helped
bury the bodies reported that one had washed ashore with the remains of a
house. All were buried quickly, however, without proper autopsies, so the
cause of death remains uncertain.
Six bodies, including an adult male, three adult females, an adolescent girl,
and a girl estimated to be about four years old, were found in East Biak on
July 27 and immediately buried by security forces. The bodies were in poor
condition, but police said that some were marked with a tattoo that
resembled the letter "w." Nine more bodies washed up the next day. Of the
six found in Amini village, five were children (three boys and two girls),
and one was an adult woman wearing a shell necklace. A body of a girl
estimated to be about twelve years old was found in Nyampun, Orwer village,
and two other headless bodies were found on Paidado island, near the
villages of Pasi and Saribra. Among the debris found linking them to Papua
New Guinea, according to police, were a map, a plastic bag with the motto
"25 Years PNG" and some Papua New Guinean coins and banknotes. On July 29,
the body of an adult male was found in Yobdi, North Biak, and that of a
young girl was found near Wadibu, East Biak. (14)
Local groups, backed by church leaders, are urging that the bodies be
exhumed so that a full investigation can proceed. Human Rights Watch
supports that demand but also believes it is critical that a fuller
investigation take place into the shootings themselves. In particular,
investigators should assess whether the Indonesian army, in firing on the
demonstrators, faced a threat serious enough to warrant the use of lethal
force. U.N.(15) Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law
Enforcement Officials state in Article 14, "In the dispersal of violent
assemblies, law enforcement officials may use firearms only when less
dangerous means are not practicable and only to the minimum extent necessary."
VI. Wamena, Jayawijaya
On July 7, the West Papuan flag was raised in front of the district council
building in Wamena, Jayawijaya district. A month later, between August 6 and
8, eleven people were arrested and are currently detained in Wamena.
According to the Institute for Human Rights Studies and Advocacy, a
Jayapura-based rights organization, the acknowledged leader of the
demonstration, Emanuel Menay, was allowed to go free, even though his role
in the flag-raising was witnessed personally by the regional military
commander. All were held in the Jayawijaya police command until November
1988 when they were transferred to the district prison as their trials got
underway.
(See Appendix I).
VII. Riots in Manokwari
At about 8:30 a.m. on October 2 in Manokwari, a district of some 150,000
people in western Irian Jaya, about twenty men lowered the Indonesian flag
outside the district council building and raised the West Papuan flag in its
place. The leader of the group was a man named Albert Kareth, an employee of
the local campus of Cenderawasih University's agriculture faculty. They sang
hymns and OPM songs, and some of the men made short speeches. Police arrived
shortly after the flag-raising took place and surrounded the demonstrators,
as crowds began to gather to see what was happening. At about 10 a.m., the
demonstrators entered into negotiations with the police, who agreed to let
the flag fly for two more hours. The demonstrators, however, insisted on
having it fly until sunset. After two hours, police approached to cut down
the flag, and the demonstrators, according to one report, tried to prevent
them from doing so with knives.(16) The police reportedly shot into the air
to try to break up the demonstration, and the crowd began throwing stones at
the police. Violence then erupted, with the crowd breaking into smaller
groups and systematically stoning, burning, and vandalizing homes and shops
along Manokwari's major streets. Shops owned by Muslim migrants from other
parts of Indonesia, especially South Sulawesi and Java, were particularly
targeted. As a result of the violence, all economic activity in the town
ceased for the next few days. By October 6, government offices were open,
but most stores remained closed. An ugly confrontation at the main market
between Bugis, the dominant Muslim migrant group, reportedly hurling
epithets at local youths, and Irianese, armed with iron pipes and knives,
was narrowly averted. By October 8, the town was functioning more or less
normally.
Church leaders who conducted an inquiry questioned whether the violence was
spontaneous but came to no conclusions, and those arrested in connection
with both the flag-raising and the violence that followed were eventually
released.
VIII. Arrest of Theys Eluay and the National
Dialogue Debate
Just before the Manokwari demonstrations, on September 29 and 30, five men
were arrested and accused of organizing the series of pro-independence
demonstrations that had begun in July. A sixth, They Eluay, a respected
tribal leader (ondofolo), was arrested the next week, on October 6. All were
charged under Article 110 of the criminal code with conspiracy to commit
crimes against national security. The arrests, and Eluay's in particular,
became a major test of how far the government was willing to go in allowing
free discussion of independence.
The first five men to be arrested, Don Flassy, Rev. Agustinus Ansanai,
Barnabas Yufuwai, Laurence Mehuwe, and Sem Yaru, were all known in Jayapura
as pro-independence advocates; indeed, led by Don Flassy, secretary of the
provincial government's Planning and Development Board, all were members of
a group called Committee for an Independent West Papua (Komite Independen
Papua Barat). Sem Yaru was a more controversial figure: a former OPM member
who had been detained in the late 1980s, Yaru was a civilian employee of the
regional military command and, according to local sources, widely suspected
in the activist community of having links to the military that went beyond
his job. When, at the end of September, he circulated flyers calling on
people to take part in a pro-independence demonstration in Jayapura on
October 2, church leaders urged their followers not to take part, fearing it
was a provocation. The demonstration did not materialize. (Two students,
arrested and briefly detained on October 2 for taking part in a meeting
three days before that police said was aimed at organizing a
pro-independence rally, wrote in testimonies made available to Human Rights
Watch that in fact, they were meeting to tell students not to take part in
the October 2 demonstration planned by Yaru.)
It was the arrest of Theys Eluay, however, that sparked a major public
reaction. Not only was he regarded as one of Irian Jaya's elder statesmen, a
man who had been among the few handpicked people to take part in the 1969
sham "vote" on integration with Indonesia but who had become an outspoken
advocate of independence. At the time of his arrest, he was also head of the
Customary Council of Irian Jaya, a government creation, but one composed
nonetheless of influential people, and his words and actions carried great
weight.
Eluay was arrested at his home in Sentani, outside Jayapura, early in the
morning on October 6. When police came to his home, he told them that the
next day he had planned to be tied up by his own people as a symbolic
gesture and be carried to the police command where the other five were
detained. He was then planning to offer to be locked up in exchange for
their release. The police rejected the plan and took him off to the police
command, where he was locked up with the others. He was formally charged
with rebellion on October 7; in addition, police said he had violated
Criminal Code Article 169 about gathering people together with the intention
of committing a crime and Article 160, inciting people to violence against
the authorities. "He himself admits that several times he called meetings to
discuss the independence of West Papua and how it should separate itself
from Indonesia," the police commander said. (17)
Eluay freely admitted meeting with Sem Yaru, whom he apparently did not
regard with the same suspicion that others did, and with Don Flassy. His
lawyers told the press that during questioning, Eluay made no effort to hide
his belief that Irian Jaya should be a separate state or that he considered
himself a leader of West Papua. He explained that he had welcomed
integration with Indonesia three decades ago but that Indonesian practices
had convinced him that independence was the best option for the Papuan
people. "If anyone is ready to be detained for his opinions, it's Theys
Eluay," the lawyer said.(18) Eluay sent letters from his cell saying he
would continue the struggle for independence from behind bars; the governor
of Irian Jaya responded by saying he was revoking the decree making Eluay
head of the tribal council.
Eluay's arrest and detention became inextricably tied to the debate over the
idea of a national dialogue One local newspaper said in mid-October that it
had been flooded with calls, as people rang up to vent their anger at
Eluay's arrest, asking the editors if it was true that he was arrested as a
way of silencing anyone who did not agree with the government that a
dialogue could only focus on greater autonomy for Irian Jaya, not
independence. The paper noted the statements of provincial security
officials in response to widespread demands for Eluay's release: that they
would never tolerate any activities that smacked of rebellion or separatism.
But, the editors asked, it was a real question if detention of independence
advocates was going to suppress the sentiment or resolve the problem. (19)
Whether or not Eluay and the others were arrested to suppress debate on
independence, the public airing of the belief that they were, together with
the massive pressure mounted within Irian Jaya, led to all six men being
released on October 22. By that time, the debate over the dialogue was in
full swing.
That debate bore striking parallels with the dynamics of tripartite talks
among the United Nations, Portugal, and Indonesia on autonomy for East Timor.
As with East Timor, the Indonesian government indicated that autonomy in
Irian Jaya could not be seen as a transition step toward independence; not
only was independence not an option, but it was even banned from discussion.
The government maintained that support for independence was restricted to a
small, if vocal, group of people, and that any dialogue had to take place on
the basis of acceptance of a unitary Indonesian state.
Freddy Numberi, the governor of Irian Jaya, said in October that the
dialogue would focus on issues such as injustice, human rights violations,
land, economic autonomy, and retaining a greater share of earnings from
natural resources so that every child in Irian Jaya could have free
schooling and health care. In an autonomous Irian Jaya, he said, security,
currency, and the court system would continue to be handled by Jakarta. (20)
Church leaders were among those who argued that for the dialogue to be an
open and honest forum, there should be no restrictions on content, nor
should the precise contours of autonomy be set beforehand. Rev. Herman Saut,
head of Irian Jaya's largest Protestant congregation, said in an interview
that if limits were going to be imposed in advance, it would no longer be a
genuine dialogue. Instead, it would be a repeat of 1969, when the interests
of the central government determined the outcome and local people had no
real say in the matter. In response to suggestions that the church was seen
as backing some of the pro-independence activities, he said the church took
no sides but wanted to ensure that its followers understood the full
implications of the three possibilities before them: autonomy, federation,
and independence. He said that independence had widespread support in the
interior of Irian Jaya and wondered aloud to the journalist whether autonomy
would be enough for people who had suffered so much under three decades of
Indonesian rule. (21)
As the debate was growing more heated and the differences between the
government position and influential community leaders growing more
pronounced, Theys Eluay used his recovered freedom to begin calling for a
major demonstration throughout the province on December 1 to commemorate the
thirtieth anniversary of the date the Dutch government promised independence
to what was then known as the territory of West Irian and the date the West
Papuan flag was flown for the first time. Throughout November, as the
anniversary approached, church leaders as well as government officials were
openly expressing concern that such a demonstration could only lead to
violence and/or widespread arrests. Eluay called off the demonstration at
the last minute, but not before troop reinforcements had been sent to all
the towns where demonstrations had taken place before. In the end, December
1 passed peacefully without either rallies or crackdowns, but the tension
built up in the preceding weeks has not diminished. Eluay now says he will
not take part in a dialogue; others in the church, NGO, and university
communities, including some who proposed the notion in the first place and
who initially greeted the government's offer with something approaching
exhilaration, are increasingly convinced that it will end up as a
Jakarta-engineered initiative with a foreordained outcome in which local
aspirations are ignored. The fact that government officials were proposing
in late november that the dialogue be postponed until late 1999 only
increased the feeling of disillusionment.
IX. Appendix: Arrests Since July 1998
1. The Biak Detainees:
All of the following were arrested in connection with the Biak
demonstrations, and all are being held in Biak prison as their trials
proceed.
Drs. Filip (Yopy) Jakob Samuel Karma was detained on July 6. Aged
thirty-nine, he is an employee of the training and education bureau of the
provincial government; he had studied public administration and management
in Manila. He was also the secretary for the provincial branch of KORPRI,
the civil servants' association linked to the ruling party, Golkar. The
prosecution charged him with being the leader of the July demonstration. He
was shot in both feet during his arrest by security forces. After not being
able to see him for over a week after his arrest, his wife was finally
allowed to visit, but she and other members of the family were experiencing
harassment from officials at least through August and believed the telephone
at the family home in Jayapura was tapped.
Nelles Sroyer, thirty-eight, is unemployed. He was accused of leading
the crowd in hymns at the time the flag was raised and of soliciting
contributions from local people to buy food for the demonstrators. He
reportedly gave a statement to police under duress and was beaten during
interrogation on July 7. He lived in the Asrama Pelayaran, Biak town.
Thonci Wabiser, aged sixty-six, is a retired policeman. He was
accused of leading prayers and collecting funds from sympathizers during the
demonstrations. He was released into the custody of his family pending trial
but was redetained before the trial began.
Melki Kmur, twenty-five, is a sometime fisherman from Inggiri village,
subdistrict Yendidori, Biak Numfor, who helped carry the flag to the
demonstration. He was beaten, forced to lie down on his back, and then
walked on by police.
Celsius Raweyai, forty-six, self-employed as a porter in the Biak
airport, he took part in the singing of the hymn "Onward Christian Soldiers"
as the flag was being raised. He was arrested at his home on July 6 and
reportedly gave a statement to police under duress. For most of his
questioning, he was not accompanied by a lawyer; a court-appointed attorney
appeared toward the end of his interrogation.
Agustinus Sada, forty-nine, is an unemployed resident of Biak town.
He was previously imprisoned for the non-political murder of a policeman. He
helped mobilize the crowd at the time of the flag-raising.
Eduard Iwanggin, known as Edu, forty-four, was released in August
into the custody of his family. He worked as a civil servant involved in
traffic control, Biak town. He was arrested at gunpoint on July 6 by three
members of the mobile police brigade and one soldier from the regional
military command (KOREM). He was not charged with assault, unlike most of
the others.
Andreas Marsyom, thirty-seven, is a civil servant in the district
government of Yapen Waropen and is a native of Dobo village, subdistrict
Warsa, North Biak. He was accused of taking part in the demonstration and
leading the singing of "Onward Christian Soldiers."
Hengky Yosias Wambrauw, twenty-three, is an unemployed man from
Samofa, Biak Numfor, whose main role during the demonstration was to provide
guitar accompaniment to the singing. He was arrested on July 6 and gave a
statement to police, reportedly under duress.
Nehemia Ronsumbre, forty-three, is a fisherman from Paray village,
East Biak, who turned himself in to the police on July 7 and was eventually
released into the custody of his family. He was later redetained before his
trial began in October.
Marinus Ronsumbre, thirty-two, is a fisherman from Paray, Samofa,
East Biak. He was beaten with a rifle butt and otherwise ill-treated during
his arrest on July 6.
Clemens Ronsumbre, fifty-seven, is a farmer, Ridge II, Biak Numfor.
Bernardus Mansawan, nineteen, was a taxi conductor. He was arrested
on July 6 but eventually released into the custody of his family. While
being questioned, he was reportedly ordered to sign a statement refusing
legal counsel.
Lamekh Dimara, twenty-two, is a farmer from Robuki village, North
Biak. He helped provide security for the demonstration and was shot with a
rubber bullet by security forces. He was charged with rebellion, spreading
hatred, and possession of a sharp weapon under Emergency Law No.12/1951.
Robert Iwanggin, also known as Roy, thirty-eight, is unemployed and a
resident of Biak town. He helped make the flag and later turned himself in
to police because he was afraid of the consequences if he did not. He was
charged with rebellion and spreading hatred.
Inseren Sampari Karma, a housewife, came to the demonstration only in
order to give her brother, Yopy Karma, a report on their father's health; he
had had an operation several days earlier. Once there, however, she stayed
to help collect funds and distribute food. A warrant for her arrest was
produced two days after she was detained on July 6. She was eventually
released into the custody of her family.
Djoumunda Costan Karma, Yopy's brother, aged thirty, was a
self-employed resident of Biak town. He helped make the flag used in the
demonstration. Arrested on July 6, he was only presented with an arrest
warrant several days later. Although the charges against him do not include
assault, they do include carrying or possessing a sharp weapon under
Emergency Law No.12/1951.
Adrianus Rumbewas, twenty-five, unemployed, took part in the
demonstration and was arrested on July 9 by members of the district military
command. He is from Inggiri village, subdistrict Yenidori, Biak Numfor. He
was charged with rebellion and spreading hatred but not with assault.
Nico Rumpaidus, forty-two, is a civil servant working for the
district government's treasury department (Kantor Pebendaharaan dan Kas
Negara). He was present when the flag used in the demonstration was made.
Originally from Paray village, Samofa subdistrict, Biak Numfor, he was
charged, like Costan Karma, with violating Emergency Law No.12/1951.
2. The Wamena Arrests
Most of the following people were not shown an arrest warrant until
twenty-four hours after they were detained, and none was accompanied by a
lawyer during interrogation. All were on trial as of December 1998.
Marinus Muabuay, fifty-eight, retired civil servant, arrested on
August 6. He watched the flag-raising as an elder in charge.
Yakobus Tanawani, twenty-seven, self-employed, arrested on August 6.
He helped raised the flag.
Soleman Manufandu, thirty-six, a teacher in a government school. He
turned himself in on August 8; he had been tasked by the flag-raisers with
making banners and the flag, the model for which was given to him by another
one of the accused, Ishak Windesi.
Ones Pariaribo, twenty-nine, self-employed. He helped make banners
and the flag, and was arrested without a warrant at the Wamena airport.
Amos Ramanday, forty, civil servant. He was responsible for
mobilizing local people to witness the flag-raising. He was arrested at his
home on August 6 without a warrant.
Piter Samalo, thirty-seven, self-employed. He helped Soleman
Manufandu and Yakobus Tanawani in making banners and the flag. He was
arrested at his home on August 7.
Paulus Guiliano Marlo Muabuay, twenty-five, unemployed. He watched
the second flag-raising and witnessed the agreement to this event by the
district military and civilian officials, members of the district council,
and one journalist (Linda Korwa). He was arrested on August 8 and was
reportedly beaten by a police captain during interrogation.
Margaretha Wakman, twenty, a contract worker in the district forestry
office in Wamena. She was a witness to the second flag-raising and was
arrested on August 8.
Jemmy Togotly, seventeen, a high school student, accused of helping
raise the flag. He told local human rights defenders that in the course of
his interrogation, he was hit with a club eighteen times, his knees were
kicked, and he was kicked in the head and beaten with a stick. He was also
told that he would be given electric shocks, although they were in fact not
administered.
Isak Windesy, a civil servant who reportedly worked with Yan Manuel
Menay in planning the flag-raising.
3. The Arrests of Pro-Independence Advocates in
Jayapura, late September and October
Immediately following the Manokwari demonstrations, two students were
arrested, Martinus Werimon and Ronald Tapilatu. Martinus was head of
the student senate at Cendrawasih University, and Ronald was a student at a
Protestant technical high school. The detention of the two on October 2
sparked a protest rally by other students at the police station where they
were held, with protestors saying Ronald and Martinus, like other students,
were only playing their role as a moral voice for the people and that part
of that role was to hold an open forum on campus where people could say
whatever they wanted. In a meeting with the protesters, in response to
questions about why the two were detained without warrant, the police chief
said it was an intelligence operation, and those were the procedures. (22)
The six pro-independence advocates arrested in
and around Jayapura were:
1. Theys Eluay, sixty-one, head of the Irian Jaya Customary Council
2. Drs. Don A.L. Flassy, fifty-three, secretary of the provincial Planning
and Development Board.
3. Rev. Agustinus Ansanai, forty-one, minister.
4. Barnabas Yufuwai, forty-five, civil servant.
5. Laurence Mehuwe, fifty-one, director of the provincial Planning and
Development Board.
6. Semual (Sem) Yaru, thirty-nine, civilian employee of the regional
military command.
Wil je reageren op dit document?
Klik dan door naar het prikbord
|
|